Mornings in Jenin

 

I love this novel, it is not modern , nor postmodern although it's written in the early 21st C, I think it's one of the reasons for me to love it. Instead of trying to create a new artistic prose and format, the author, Susan Abulhawa, has something to tell. A story. A story which grows almost organically out of historical events which occured in the early 1940's up to now in the British protectorate Palestine, Israel, Jordan and the West Bank.

There are so many features in this novel that render it the epithet masterpiece; it is clearly a call for compassion with the arabs in Palestine against the Israeli violence and still one of the families that we get to know in the book is jewish, belonging to the group of jews that fled Europe just before the holocaust. Another one is the love story between the daughter-in-law, Dalia, and her mother - in -law, Basima, who at first was against the marriage between her son and the bedouine girl, yet takes  her to her heart, as if she was the daughter she never got herself, after getting to know her. Another is the story about Darweesh and his beautiful stallion Ganoosh.

The novel consists of these mini-portraits of villagers spread around the world. The assorted portraits give the novel a resemblance to a great French 19th C novel such as Germinal by Zola or any work by Balzac.To the great shame of European culture we are not used to reading these kind of novels about people outside Europe. We see novels like Mornings in Jenin as something new and thus interesting. Of course 19th C novels have to be written about others too, Europeans are not the only persons who got stories to tell. Terefore Mornings in Jenin is not interesteing because of the novelty of it, because there is nothing modern about it, it is interesting exactly in the same way as Crime and Punishment, Les Miserables or Middlemarch is interesting; it has a great story to tell about real human beings.

You might criticize Mornings in Jenin for being biased for the Palestinian arabs and against jews in general and Isreli jews in particular. For instance it once claims thet the 6-day war started by Israeli forces attacking Egypt. However, this is the story told from the perspective of a child that  survived, a child that got all her news from highly biased media, it is not a history book, it is a story about real human beings, a human tragedy striking innocent people who are used for other's benefit in many ways. It's claims are not historic accuracy but humanitarian accuracy and in this it is a great success.

I have met people that, thanks to Mornings in Jenin has understood the complexity and gravity of the conflict in the Middle East. Like the Diary of Anne Frank's brought us to understand that behind the monstrous figures of millions and millions perishing in the Holocaust are real human beings like you and me, Mornings in Jenin give voice and face to those who suffered and suffers from the clearing of Israeli land to let jews take over what arabs had built up during centuries. This novel let us know that behind the figures of hundred thousands of Palestinians living in refugee camps for generations there are persons, real human beings, with voices and wishes, hopes and dreams.

This truth becomes extra visible by showing us the joys of the refugees from Ein Hoda, we are all too familiar with the sorrows of them. Such as the trip back to the village of grandpa to harvest his own gardens or the mornings which Amal spent with her father reading and discussing, listening to him reciting poems by Gibran or when Huda and Amal painted their finger and toe nails with red nail polish one week before the war.

In search of the human good of Dorothea Brooke, Mornings in Jenin gives us clues to and maps out a possible way to reach there. The novel certainly is biased and lacks the complexity of a novel by Tolstoy, where you never really manages to pin point who are the good guys and who are the bad ones, but it gives you an understanding of the human mind, the ugliness of war and the beauty of what people can do to relief suffering of others despite ethnical barriers raised between them by people with more power than heart. Read it!

Holocaust of Downs-children

Flyn, 4 years old, soon to be exterminated

Right now  a holocaust is going on in the world, the holocaust of the variety of humanity called a person with Down's syndrom. Down's syndrom doesn't mean that a person suffers, sometimes a Downs child can suffer from a heart disorder  but it is easily fixed with modern medicine in the countries where human beings with Down's syndrom is a threatened species.

The curing of that heart disorder and the extra help a Downs child might need in school costs some money, and they will probably never become very rich since they normally don't get the most well paied jobs in society. For that reason medical care offers all pregnant women a so called KUB-test which shows if the fetus has 47 chromosomes in  stead of 46 which is the cause of Down's syndrom.

Most people with Down's syndrom are more than usually light hearted, it comes with the syndrom. They are more than others musical and sociable, that's why they are said to be "friendly". They look a bit different than others with "Mongolian" features; almond eyes and a pale complexion. Their fingers and toes are often, all ten,  of the same length and they are often short and a bit chubby. They are slow learners but given time they often learn to read and write and to conduct their own lives with some help. That is it.

Down's syndrom is simply a variety of being human. So why do they scan mothers for this syndrom? The simple answer is; we can do it. If we could scan ADD or alletgies we would do that. For the moment we can't do that, luckily enough, since insecure parents often choose to terminate the pregnancy when they find out that ther fetus has 47 chromosomes.

In the fragile position as a parent to be , the society tells you: "Here is some information for you. Do as you please" It sounds great, but when you get the fake impression that Down's is a serious condition which causes great suffering for the child, are you really free to make a decision? A decision based upon false information , is that a free choice?

And for how long can we choose to keep our babies with Down's syndrom? In Denmark parents who refuse to exterminate their off-spring if they have Down's syndrom are called "egotistic" and "irresponsible" so how far is it to the step when you are obliged to kill your child with Down's or some other minor disorder like allergies or stuttering?

Furthermore, what happens to a society where only the perfect are allowed to be born?

For all that I know I wouldn't want to live in that kind of society.